No multiverse or Parallel universe

Taking the emergent universe concept to its logical summation.


Our universe could only be a singular, vast expanse containing all possibilities implying:

1. No multiverse: There could be no separate universes with different physical laws if we consider that the universe could be made of emergent units in all its realms.

Or else if there exists places with different physical laws such regions could be part of our universe and such laws wouldn't be independent of our physical laws but possibly complimentary.

For instance a universe where gravity works in reverse, or light is slower or more than 3 or 4 physical dimensions. Possibly no.

2. All possibilities are encompassed: Our universe contains every possible outcome, configuration, and scenario.

3. Unity and coherence: The universe is a cohesive, interconnected system, governed by a unified set of physical laws. This coherence could be to compensate de emergence. We are saying the universe and all its systems should be emergence. If everything is made of gradients of the interplay between emergence and de emergence there should be compensatory behaviours between the two, such as promoting or demoting each other.

This perspective resonates with various philosophical and scientific frameworks, such as:

1. Externalism: The universe is a four-dimensional spacetime continuum, containing all moments and possibilities.

2. Determinism: Every event and outcome is predetermined and part of the universe's unfolding.

3. Non-dualism: The universe is a singular, undivided whole, with no separate, parallel universes.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Physics: What actually is time? Why doesnt it go backwards? Decay Theory tries to answer

Why Time doesnot go backwards: Short answer

The real origin of the universe