New Discovery: The big bang was not an explosion but an overflow in causality
BIG BANG WAS AN OVERFLOW IN CAUSALITY
2024
A Novel Perspective on the Origin of the Universe:
Emergence from a Quantum Cosmic Void.
...........
A new discovery says the Big Bang is poorly understood because it is viewed from a wrong observer point.
Instead of being an explosion, the Big bang was an overflow in causality.
Causality is the causation and effect according to fundamental physics.
The new study is contained in the manuscripts of "Decay Theory Cosmology and Physics," an African perspective.
It is being developed in Africa, by African physicist Harry Mangulenje, with over 20 years of study.
Here is the theory.
Abstract:
The Big Bang remains the only process recognized by scientists and physicists as the origin of nature.
Physicists have proved repeatedly, that the Big Bang is the only process through which our universe was born.
But there are unresolved problems most of which emerge from how it is understood, interpreted and applied in theoretic models all over the world.
To this point, some have even doubted it. But despite doubting it, it continues coming out as the only model that makes sense in physics and science because it is backed up by many evidences such as Cosmic Microwave Backgrounds (CMB).
How would a state of nothingness explode into something?
The universe was born from a hot and dense atom that burst open. But where did this atom come from?
We therefore propose a unique approach to understanding the birth of the universe.
We posit that the laws of nature preceded the universe itself. Our theory suggests that a quantum cosmic void, governed by probabilistic laws which mutated into logical laws, existed prior to the emergence of space and time.
Causality therefore was a conversion process from nonentity to entity realms driven by the breakdown or decaying of the perfect probabilistic cosmic nothingness.
The breakdown of perfect probabilistic equilibrium led to the manifestation of dimensionality, laws of nature, and ultimately, the universe.
This was guided by the limits of causality themselves
Introduction:
The origin of the universe remains one of the most fundamental questions in physics. Our approach challenges conventional views by introducing the concept of a quantum cosmic void, where probabilistic laws governed the emergence of reality.
The Quantum Cosmic Void:
We define the quantum cosmic void as a realm where probabilistic laws dictated the behavior of matter and energy. This void was characterized by a perfect balance between matter and antimatter, entity and anti-entity, force and antiforce, and progress and anti-progress, where in every entity had an opposite partner.
Emergence of Dimensionality:
The breakdown of perfect probabilistic equilibrium led to the manifestation of dimensionality, enabling the emergence of laws of nature.
The emergence of dimensionalities made the possibility of logic states that promoted information medium.
This process was bounded by the limitations of causality.
As a result, the cosmic void, accumulated physical states in particular regions.
The Big Bang:
We propose that the Big Bang was not an explosion, but rather an overflow or a break free.
But if viewed from a proper observer point, it was a causality sped up.
What does this mean?
It simply means the space was being created the same time the Big Bang was happening.
The fact that the Big Bag flushed out all celestial bodies, such as galaxies, planets, stars allowed nuclear synthesis of different nature to happen etc.
We posit that there must be prior laws governing it, no matter that, such the origin of such laws cannot be locally observable beyond the Big Bang itself.
We posit that the cosmic void suddenly hosted an accummulation which later became so tensed due to the Causality continuity on one hand and the bounds in the Causality mechanics on the other.
This jinx had to break-even in a form of mechanism overflow.
This triggered a speed up in Causality mechanics too
To explain it quite simply, the Big Bang was a process, drastically sped up to free some tension or a condition where a process got drastically RUSHED UP to make up for some accumulations.
"Limitations of Existence"
This refers to the constraints or boundaries that define and shape the nature of the cosmic existence.
These limitations can be fundamental, inherent, and universal, affecting all aspects of existence, including:
1. _Causality_: The relationship between cause and effect, influencing the unfolding of events.
2. _Space-time_: The fabric that combines space and time, governing the structure of the universe.
3. _Matter and energy_: The building blocks of the universe, subject to physical laws and constraints.
4. _Consciousness_: The nature of awareness, perception, and experience, influencing our understanding of reality.
5. _Quantum mechanics_: The principles governing the behavior of particles at the smallest scales, introducing uncertainty and probabilism.
6. _Thermodynamics_: The laws governing energy, entropy, and the arrow of time.
7. _Logical and mathematical constraints_: The fundamental principles governing reasoning, logic, and mathematics.
So, the link between classical existence and quantum is the limitations of causality.
These limits make the two fundamental principles interact because they shape the possibilities and impossibilities within existence, defining what can and cannot be, and influencing the evolution of the universe and our understanding of it.
In this context, "Limitations of Causality" specifically refers to the constraints that govern the causality mechanism, leading to the emergence of dimensionality, laws of nature, and ultimately, the universe.
Hyper inflation
Science has empirical evidence of hyper inflation during the Big Bang.
In our view, the hyper inflation was a speed up Causation mechanics to make up for the accumulation.
Conclusion:
Our theory offers a novel perspective on the origin of the universe, suggesting that the laws of nature emerged from a quantum cosmic void in the background of its limits.
This approach provides a framework for understanding the birth of reality, challenging conventional views and inviting further exploration.
Therefore, the prebig bang was a void that exhibited the sway between characteristics of logic and probability, in what can be termed as quantum probabilistic wave-foam or soup!
References:
Ref: Quantum Mechanics, String Theory, Quantum Gravity, Newtonian mechanics, Einstein theories, Lorentz transformation, Hawking radiation, etc
Hubbles law
The Universe itself is expanding – observations of distant galaxies have shown that the farther they are from us, the faster they are moving away (a concept known as Hubble’s law). This led to the proposal of the Big Bang theory, which suggests that the Universe began from a very hot and dense point and has been expanding.
..........
Decay Theory
This model is novel but it challenges some ideas from known physicists such as Stephen Hawking's who proposed that the laws of nature came into existence at the big bang because beyond that, laws of nature make no observable sense and that such laws do not require immaterial law giver.
Here is an extract of the notions about the big bang that ignore previous big bang.
The standard Big Bang cosmology model proposes that time came into existence with the universe in a singularity approximately 14 billion years ago. While he rejected the supernatural, the late Stephen Hawking said, "At a singularity, all the laws of physics would have broken down. ... Since events before the Big Bang have no observational consequences, one may as well cut them out of the theory, and say that time began at the Big Bang. Events before the Big Bang, are simply not defined, because there's no way one could measure what happened at them."
He went on to argue against the notion of external, supernatural agency in the formation of the universe. However, he did say something very telling: "... the Big Bang is a beginning that is required by the dynamical laws that govern the universe. It is therefore intrinsic to the universe. ..."
Hawking rejected the supernatural. He believed that the laws of physics were non-existent in the singularity before the Big Bang. Yet attributed the formation of the universe after the Big Bang to these very same laws. The laws of physics are immaterial and are intrinsic to our universe. Yet they did not exist, as far as observable science can tell, prior to the Big Bang. Therefore, it would not be unreasonable to conclude that complex immaterial laws require a complex, immaterial Lawgiver.
....
Please support and donate to this incredible scientific work.
Answering tough scientific questions.
Patreon: harrymangulenje@gmail.com

Comments
Post a Comment