Better reason why Terrece D Howard claims: 1x1=2 : Decay Theory Cosmology Africa


American Actor, investor, physicist and philanthropist Terrece D Howard claims to have developed a physics theory of  everything.

In his statement he makes many claims which he says are already patented in his name. 

The most controversial of all, is his claim that 1x1 is not 1 but 2. 

Many mathematicians have rebutted him on this claim and he still continues to claim that time has come for the world to begin appreciating better formulas.

A closer look at this claim, shows that Howard is both right and wrong.

He is right because he says, in a physical sense, combining two separate entities is similar to multiplying entities.

So, if two separate entities are combined they make two objects which means 1x1 could be 2.

There more than one ways, to defend Howard. 

In computer logic for example, 1x1 is not 1 but 2. This is  done because the symbol + is not used to represent addition but something else.

So 1x1, the symbol x represents the tradition additional symbol +  but this doesnot change the operand add.

This scenario could be used to defend Howard, however it appears that's not his intention.

He intends to completely rewrite the operand + .

During an interview Howard said, if an object is divided out once, it becomes two pieces which is just another way of representing multiplication 

Cell division is sometimes referred to as a cell multiplication.

However the implication of this suggestion is that the whole mathematics would need to be redesigned.

If 1x1 =2 it means and 4x4 equals 8 NOT 16.

Perhaps Howards wants to say, this appeals to 1 only. But Mathematical operands cannot be applied in isolation. An operand shall have to work in the same way in every scenario.

So 1x2 has to be 3 not 2,  3x3 has to be 6 not 9.

In the end, we have not changed anything other than the operand alone. So it may mean X would be used both as a multiplication operand and addition, which means, we have just substituted the + symbol.

In a nutshell this means nothing at all.

Otherwise, Howard needs to dig deeper and present better examples for his case.

In most Computer Logic 1x1 is 2 but the symbol x is just used in place of +, the operand mechanics is the same. And X as multiplication symbol is replaced by *.

So it doesnot change anything.



written by HARRY MANGULENJE, SOUTH AFRICA



 



  

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Physics: What actually is time? Why doesnt it go backwards? Decay Theory tries to answer

Image
Stephen Hawkings  said the universe is nothing but a collection of emergent fields, states and systems. Nikolai Tesla said the universe is vibrations and frequencies.  To agree with the two I consider time as a rate. So everything bubbles out and dies or gets replaced. You are made of mass which is made of discrete units that bubble out and die down being replaced by other units . The rate of emergence, de emergence and discrete causal frequencies. I believe time emerges and de emerges just as any quantum system. Quantum systems bubble out, obey probability, take logic states before de emerging or decay out to  lower states. So if emergence represents causality or the disruption of equillibriun, then time is the rate frequency of that process. I refer to causality and effects. I also refer to Nikolai Tesla:  "If you want to understand the universe, think about frequency rate and vibrations." Loop Quantum Gravity considers the universe as made of granules of space tim...
Read more

Why Time doesnot go backwards: Short answer

Image
The Decay Theory Cosmology developed in Africa in 2024 by an independent scholar Harry Mangulenje as a proposal into Quantum mechanics, posits that TIME can be conceptualized as a quantifiable rate of decay, wherein systems exhibit entropic progression from higher to lower energy states.  This theoretical model, developed by Harry Mangulenje, integrates principles from quantum mechanics and thermodynamics to elucidate the fundamental nature of time and the universe. The theory proposes that the universe operates within a fluid dynamic of discrete quanta states, emerging and demerging spontaneously under probabilistic guidance.  As these systems evolve, they undergo decay from higher to lower states, ultimately attaining a logical state that represents the lower profile of their probabilistic nature. This perspective implies that time serves as a measure of the rate of this procession, quantifying the progression from emergence to de emergence or decay or collapse. The irrevers...
Read more

The real origin of the universe

Image
The origin of existence can be attributed to the spontaneous breakdown or decay of a nonentity equilibrium also can be termed as quantum vacuum. If you like, this can answer the question, what existed before the university in the very initial state of absolute emptiness. The state of absolute emptiness or absolute quantum vacuum was a state of probabilistic equilibrium where every possibility was nullified by equal and opposite, for example we can be sure that possible entities were nullified by anti entities resulting in probabilistic equilibrium. But spontaneously this condition failed by itself leading to a breakdown of the equilibrium. When equilibrium collapsed or decayed energy entities got manifestation and evolution begun. So time could be traced way back to the breakdown of equilibrium when entities began to evolve. This triggered the emergence of existence and its fabric, including time.  Quantum vacuum equilibrium or nonentity equilibrium is where all probabilistic ener...
Read more