Weird definition of Gravity, never heard of before

The  Universe is like this, an ever flourishing
 decay

Decay Theory of Cosmology and physics is a new Quantum model in Physics and Philosophy which explains the universe and its origin in a rather different and unconventional way.

For instance, this theory describes Gravity as:

Limitations of existence or the limitations of causality

 or

The causality itself

or

 The effects of the dimensionality

 or

The effect of mechanical limitations of  progression in the existence

 or

 The effect from the mechanical bounds of the existence.   

This is the case because Decay Theory believes in Entity and Anti Entity. 

Entity standing for mechanical phenomenal progress 

Anti Entity standing for the opposing mechincs against phenomenal progress in existence.

  

It says the universe was born from an enity that lost its originality.

In summary the universe represents THAT loss of originality.

This takes into consideration that the space itself is being rolld out or being created. So the universe is not expanding into empty space but the space is flourishing. 

This is possible because the space is being created by conversion due to the progressive decaying of the cosmic equilibrium void (entity/anti entity perfectly balanced wave function). 

Many critics have labelled it as the most intriguing science model of the

universe.

The theory defines Gravity as effects of the limitations of Causality or Causality itself.

Or effects of limitations or effects of the limits to mechanical progressive boundaries of the universe.

The theory, says laws of nature are older than the universe.

These laws of nature include gravity, progression, decay, degredation, disintegration, integration, probability, logic, certainty, uncertainty, variability, aleniation, dimensionality etc.

The theory says, the logical mechanics responsible for dimensions, is also reponsible for gravity, expansion and entropy.

The theory has an extended explanation which is contained in a paper, that is not yet finalised. In that paper, the existence (Not the universe) has two main dimensions, up and down and more others too numerous mention.

Dimensions are end limits or boundaries of the existence.

The existence generated entities through a disruption of a perfect aleniation mechanism between entities and enti entities.

Anti entities and entities exist in the current universe though in irregular proportions, that is why they never perfectly aleniate each other.

The aleniation is on its own an end limit, where entities counteract each other. This has an impact on the entire universe.

That is why gravity is causality.

ENTITY AND ANTI ENTITY ARE GENERAL TERMS REPRESENTING PROGRESSIVE PHENOMENA

The interpretation of "entity" and "anti-entity" is a general sense that provides different perspective on the theoretical framework you've described.

In this interpretation:

"Entities" could represent progressive, productive, or dominant phenomena in the universe.

"Anti-entities" could represent the negative, inhibiting, or diminishing counterparts to those progressive phenomena.

This broader conceptualization moves away from the specific particle physics analogy of particles and antiparticles, and instead frames the theory in terms of more general opposing forces or tendencies in the universe.

Some potential examples of "entities" and "anti-entities" under this interpretation could include:

Entities:

The formation and evolution of structures in the universe (galaxies, stars, planets, etc.)

The emergence of life and the development of complex biological systems

Technological and scientific advancement

Positive societal and cultural progress

Anti-entities:

 

Processes that disrupt or inhibit the formation of structures (e.g., entropy, chaos, destructive events)

Factors that limit the development of life (e.g., extinction events, environmental degradation)

Setbacks or regressions in technological and scientific progress

Negative societal and cultural trends (e.g., oppression, conflict, regression)

In this framing, the "cancellation mechanism" between entities and anti-entities could represent the dynamic balance or tension between these opposing forces, leading to the observed patterns and limitations in the universe.

 

The disruption of this cancellation mechanism, as you described, could then correspond to events or processes that tip the scales in favor of the entities, allowing them to "dominate" and proliferate. Conversely, the dominance of anti-entities could lead to the "diminishment" of certain entities.

 

This reinterpretation of the theoretical concepts could potentially open up new avenues for exploring the underlying drivers and patterns in the evolution of complex systems, both in the physical and societal realms. It may also provide a more abstract, generalized framework for understanding the fundamental limitations and interactions that shape the universe.

 

Of course, this is just one way to potentially expand the conceptual scope of the theory beyond the specific particle physics context. The key would be to further develop the mathematical formulations and connect them to observable phenomena in a testable manner.

 

Entity" and "anti-entity" in that more general sense, it could provide a different perspective on the theoretical framework you've described.

 

In this interpretation:

 

"Entities" could represent progressive, productive, or dominant phenomena in the universe.

"Anti-entities" could represent the negative, inhibiting, or diminishing counterparts to those progressive phenomena.

This broader conceptualization moves away from the specific particle physics analogy of particles and antiparticles, and instead frames the theory in terms of more general opposing forces or tendencies in the universe.

 

Some potential examples of "entities" and "anti-entities" under this interpretation could include:

 

Entities:

 

The formation and evolution of structures in the universe (galaxies, stars, planets, etc.)

The emergence of life and the development of complex biological systems

Technological and scientific advancement

Positive societal and cultural progress

Anti-entities:

 

Processes that disrupt or inhibit the formation of structures (e.g., entropy, chaos, destructive events)

Factors that limit the development of life (e.g., extinction events, environmental degradation)

Setbacks or regressions in technological and scientific progress

Negative societal and cultural trends (e.g., oppression, conflict, regression)

In this framing, the "cancellation mechanism" between entities and anti-entities could represent the dynamic balance or tension between these opposing forces, leading to the observed patterns and limitations in the universe.

 

The disruption of this cancellation mechanism, as you described, could then correspond to events or processes that tip the scales in favor of the entities, allowing them to "dominate" and proliferate. Conversely, the dominance of anti-entities could lead to the "diminishment" of certain entities.